And that's exactly what Jagger did; and when it
found those sites, it simply adjusted their
ranking to more accurately reflect their true
importance.
From a
technical standpoint, Jagger was well described
by Ken Webster in his article, Google's Jagger Update -
Dust Begins To Settle?. The most important points noted by
Ken were:
1)
Increased importance placed on IBL (Inbound
Links) Relevancy
2) Increased importance placed on OBL
(Outbound Links) Relevancy
3) Promotion of relevant Niche Directories
(related to No. 1 & #2)
Some other
interesting effects were reported by WG Moore. By monitoring the links
to his test sites as reported by Google, he
established that:
"...
Google is down-grading or eliminating
reciprocal links as a measure of
popularity... a few of our reciprocal links
did come back up... from articles where we
discussed our area of expertise: Web
Analytics... So we feel that these links came
back because of content, not linking."
In short, Jagger
undid the hard work of thousands - if not
millïons - of people! As a result, hard-won high
rankings and revenues plummeted.
Interestingly,
article PR (article submission - came through Jagger
seemingly unscathed. My SEO copywriting website DivineWrite.com, for example, went from
no.4 to no.1 worldwide for
"copywriter", and I've employed article
PR almost exclusively. Whether it was promoted or
the sites around it were demoted, one thing is
clear: article PR is one of the best ways to
obtain a high ranking.
Google
Analytics
The second
monumental event to occur recently was Google Analytics. Google Analytics is a
frëe web-stats solution which not only reports
all the regular site stats, but also integrates
directly with Google AdWords giving webmasters an
insight into the ROI of their pay-per-click ads.
According to Google, "Google Analytics tells
you everything you want to know about how your
visitors found you and how they interact with
your site."
Why is this such a landmark move? Because for the
first time ever, Google will have access to your
real web stats. And these stats will be far more
accurate than those provided by Alexa. Furthermore, Google's privacy statement says: "We may also
use personal information for auditing, research
and analysis to operate and improve Google
technologies and services.". Nöw let's put
two and two together:
1) Google
is 'giving' every webmaster in the world frëe
access to quality web-stats.
2) Millïons of webmasters will accept
this 'gift', if only because it integrates
directly with their Google AdWords campaigns.
3) Google will then have full access to
the actual web stats of millïons of commercial
websites.
4) Google will have the right to use these
stats to develop new technologies.
5) What's the next logical step? Google
will use these statistics to help determine its
rankings.
It should come as
no surprise. It's been on the cards for a long
time. For example, Jayde Online CEO, Mel Strocen,
recently published an article on this very topic,
The Future of WebSite
Ranking.
He quite rightly asserts that:
"Google's
"democratic" vision of the Web will
nevër be achieved by manipulating algorithm
criteria based on content. It will only be
achieved by factoring in what is important to
people, and people will always remain the
best judge of what that is. The true
challenge for search engines in the future is
how to incorporate web searcher input and
preferences into their ranking
algorithms."
In fact, the Jayde
Online network already owns and operates a search
engine, ExactSeek which incorporates user
popularity statistics in its rankings.
The Future of
Search & SEO
To date, ExactSeek
is the only search engine which uses visitor
stats as criteria for its rankings. But Google
isn't far behind. We all know that Google
specializes in taking a good idea and
implementing and adapting it brilliantly. This is
exactly what we'll see in this case. By combining
link popularity and user popularity statistics,
Google will be the only major search engine to
consider both what other sites think of your
website and what your visitors think of your
website. And because they have the most advanced
algorithms for assessing link popularity, and
will soon have access to the farthest reaching,
most accurate web stats to assess user
popularity, its competitors will be a long time
catching up.
So if that's the
future of search, what's the future of SEO? The
future of SEO is undoubtedly one where:
- one-way text
links from relevant pages continue to be
the most valuable links
- reciprocal
linking continue to decline
- the 'shotgun'
approach to link buying declines
- mass email
link requests decline
- frëe
directory submission declines
- niche
directory submission increases
- article PR
(article submission) increases
- article
submission sites (e.g. EzineArticles, GoArticles, and ArticleBlast play a much
bïgger and more important role in
helping online publishers locate quality
articles (due to the increasing article
volume)
- user
popularity is just as important as link
popularity, which means:
- the
quality of article PR improves in
order to increase site traffïc,
credibility, and loyalty
- the
quality of website content
improves in order to convert
traffïc and encourage repeat
visits
Clearly, the
choices for SEOs will be pretty much limited to
paying for links at niche sites and/or engaging
in article PR. Being an SEO copywriter, I may be
a little biased, but for me, article PR is the
hands-down winnër in this comparison:
- It satisfies
Google's criteria for relevance and
importance. Linking site owners include
your article and link because, in doing
so, their site becomes more useful to
visitors, and their business gains
credibility and authority.
- It generates
hundreds of frëe links quickly enough to
make it worth your while, but not so
quickly as to raise red flags at Google
(in the form of link dampening).
- Links are
permanent and you don't have to pay to
keep them there.
- You get a lot
of qualified referred traffïc who
already trust you and your expertise.
This satisfies Google's visitor
popularity criteria, while at the same
time bringing you a lot of extra
customers.
(For more
information on article PR, read How to Top Google with
Article PR)
Conclusion
The lesson from
Jagger is, don't try and trick Google! They've
got more monëy and more brains than virtually
any company in the world. It'll only end in
tears! Don't spend time and monëy trying to make
your site look important and relevant. Instead,
spend that time and monëy actually making it
important and relevant! Content - the real
content behind the optimization - is the answer.
After all, whether it's an article or a web page,
it's the content that keeps 'eyes on paper', and
that's what it's all about.
Happy optimizing!
About The Author
* Glenn Murray is a website copywriter, SEO copywriter, and article submission and article PR
specialist.
He owns article submission service Article PR and
copywriting studio Divine Write. He can be
contacted on Sydney +612 4334 6222 or at glenn@divinewrite.com. Visit DivineWrite.com or ArticlePR.com for further details, more
Frëe articles, or to download his Frëe SEO
e-book.
Subscribe to
Monthly Online Marketer Newsletter
and Receive a Bonus Gift.
|